Divorul Reglementelor
What is right, when two people get divorced, have a person who was not successful, the marriage did not bring anything to get what others have built over the years more? And why are many women, so unlike the pre-nups. I think I found an answer. Women opposed to pre-nups because they know if a divorce they will not get anything. Most women do not marry for love and financial security for divorced if they want financial stability. A pre-NUP in violation. Divorce settlements should be changed. It is unfair that people who did nothing get half the money. If there are chidlren involved when child support is expected, but other than that nothing else should be givne the husband. Let him / her find her own path in life and do not sucking money from more diligent partner.
about 6 months ago
This is why I'm going to marry a rich woman hot.
about 6 months ago
Typically, marriage is supposed to be a team. One could become more successful than others, but this does not mean that both do not contribute to the marriage. Success on the one hand is mainly willing to take other more mundane tasks, but mandatory.
about 6 months ago
Because if one party has been successful and have brought nothing into the marriage the other hand still chose to marry that person and chose to stay with them for many years. Most separations are both guilty.
about 6 months ago
Because a pre-NUP, they can not do what you just said.
about 6 months ago
For the same reason that poor people who marry rich women are afraid of pre-nups. That said, most people misunderstand them. Pre-nups go both ways, and your lawyer should look over before signing it, whether you are rich or not. A good pre-NUP protects both parties. When you marry, you are partners. If you do not want anyone to get all your pre-marriage things, get pre-NUP. If you do not, then tough cookies. You made the commitment, now you are responsible for it. Legal means to protect, rich or poor, are there. Is correct. I do not feel sorry for anyone in this situation. If you have the dough and get married, half of it belongs to their husband if it was not a pre-NUP. That's what marriage is. If you do not like to receive pre-NUP or get married. Or marry someone closer to your salary range.
about 6 months ago
Because they are half his income. I personally do not think it fair. When they poured up the whole world should go with what they brought into the marriage. . Bur women. . . Oh women. . . LOLOhh, but reading the first response should say. . . Oh men men. . . . Fair play.
about 6 months ago
One way of looking at it is follows: W is at home all day while H factory. W watches children and clean house. W gave her U.S. $ 50,000 a year job when she had children, so that H could work. W also stopped going to school at night so that H could work. W as it did all these things shall be entitled to money when there is a divorce, the money will go to the fact that she gave up her job and gave up coal.Acesta is not necessarily that she did not put anything in the marriage – is that it must be compensated for what was taken away from them b / c of marriage – ie they work and have no idea educaie.Nu why a woman would be opposed to a pre-NUP. I want to connect my husband to protect my money, including any inheritance I get (Brittney Spears is an example).
about 6 months ago
Why do you think that things should be fair? However, if you really love that person, it should not conteze.Acum, if you go further and say that the other deserves some of your money that makes the now, then I think it's pre-nups nebun.Cred that are wrong, and I'm a guy. If you're going to get married, might as well jump right into it. Just do not get married if you do not trust your partner.